0
jakee

New PF V-range?

Recommended Posts

So Jarno has in flight photos of the new Viper and Jokke has his prototype V5... anyone have any details? Release dates?

I've almost persuaded myself to put in an order with squirrel to replace my V3 but if Phoenix-Fly's new toys are on the horizon...:)
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
An official release for the new V's big borther is coming up soon.
Though we have arrived at what we believe is a final prototype, we always have a few months of additional testing before its available to the public.

In design, the suit resembles the Vampire a lot. Agility, speed and ease of flying have been our main focus, and the reason we choose the V(5) as a starting point in the design. More detailed overviews on the actual improvements and new features of these suits will soon emerge.

But the way things look, templates for various sizes will soon be made and we'll roll out with an official release on that suit and the 'other' new V.
If you are coming to Puerto Rico coming week, I will have the suit with me for those wanting to see.

Official dates for release I cant give you yet, but you'll probably see the suits on the website before all the snow is gone so stay tuned...
JC
FlyLikeBrick
I'm an Athlete?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Apache in that light looks a lot like the CCPF (a fun big wing experiment we did at PF over 4 years ago, pic pic), almost 2 years prior to the creation of the suits you mention. Who copied who? Or was there copying involved? I think the answer to both questions is a lot simpler.

When looking at the basic outline of any suit (be it the current big suits from Intrudair, S-Fly, PF, Tony or Squirrel) its easy to point and say 'copy'.
But give a 5 year old a picture of Patrick DeGuyardon's (in comparison) tiny wingsuit, and tell them to 'make it bigger' and you'll end up with the same rough outline most big suits sport these days. There are only so many (or should I say few) ways you can make armwings and legwings bigger. In the end, most 'big wings' will end up with roughly the same outline/shape. Is that copying or simply the limits of the human body as a basic frame to build around?

In terms of inlet design, they are not much different from what we've had on all previous versions of the suits, be it for some small changes.

Its the subtle differences in the suit that in the end determine handling, inflation, steering and more. With the new V's we think we have some new changes in design that are a great improvement/addition to the previous products we've released.

Exactly how these new suits vary from whats out there, we'll detail on the website once we go towards official release.
JC
FlyLikeBrick
I'm an Athlete?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

From pictures I have seen, the viper looks a lot like an apache with squirrel vents. What are the differences?



Frankly, when I saw images of the new Squirrel suit, the Colugo, it looked like an Apache-clone to me.

We're coming to a point where latest suits simply have a similar design. The varieties are in the details, and as long as the customer benefits from it, it's fine.

Martin

P.S.: My spelling sucks...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think people's ideas about wingsuit design and history tend to vary a bit per person. And not always based on accurate knowledge, but more based on personal oppinion.

There will always be some influence across the market and various brands. But it seems like a bit of a waste of time to keep pushing every thread for PF, Sfly, Tony or Squirrel into a comparison game where people scream which suit influenced what.
JC
FlyLikeBrick
I'm an Athlete?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

but didn't that experiment of pf simply copied tony's new then design that become the i/t/r/s/x-bird? except it was to show the ridiculousness of the size of tony suits?
it was revolutionary and tony was first on the market and you simply cannot deny that.



I think you've missed the point of Jarno's post - there's only a limited amount of distinctive shapes possible for this sort of purpose. Eventually, at the larger end, they're all going to look very similar.

I still remember when I first discovered wingsuits (way before I was able to jump one) and this forum; back then it seemed that the two most well-known manufacturers were PF and Birdman (and the GoPro HD didn't exist).
I don't recall people trying to make a pissing contest out of the fact that a Raptor looked like a Ghost or that a Blade looked like a Vampire. Before the X-Bird turned up the flying carpet was the Stealth2 - and so what?
It was almost like people were more concerned with how much fun they could have jumping them rather than who thought of what first!

Now we see other manufacturers coming out, e.g. Aliensuits, Squirrel, and if you only pay attention to the shadow they make on the ground then they do seem very similar.

Just a thought, can anyone here aside from Giselle come up with a design for a wingsuit with the largest surface area possible, that doesn't bear any resemblance to an X-Bird/Venom/G12/Colugo/Apache ?

I don't know about anyone else but the biggest problem I have right now is that I don't have enough money to buy one of every model from every manufacturer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Of course the shadows are going to be the same... The differences are going to be airfoil shape, thickness of wings, inlet feeding, cross-bracing/stability of shape, changes in leading edge design and wing sweep just to name a few. All of which will change the characteristics of flight substantially. Surface area isn't everything, it just makes you fall slower and it's not what makes you fly. Lift and drag are, changing the thickness and taper of the airfoil is just as important, as are better ways to help the suit maintain that shape and reduce drag.

Performance changes are going to be from the things not evident in a photograph of the suit on the ground, and will still be difficult to visualize even in flight. They will be very subtle changes and gains will come in small increments.

Also, Squirrel looks to be concentrating on some safety improvements they felt were lacking from other designers, perhaps because PF and TS were too busy trying to keep up with production and demand for ever increasing surface area. Like better inlet feeding and pressurization stability.

The more they copy each other and add their own ideas and improvements the better it is for us. I would love to see all three take the same suit as a base and go from there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's how it should be. The suits would evolve much faster if that were the case.

I was actually speaking to Fidel Mach at the last boogie and he showed me a really sweet design that makes you slap yourself and say "Why didn't I think of that!"
Hopefully the prototypes work out. If they do, it's a huge boost to wingsuit safety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The short version of a long story - I ordered a v4 a while ago for my trip to empuria this week, lead times should have had the suit at home at the start of Jan, at start of Jan PF thought it would be start of feb, last week contacted PF and was told it would another 4 weeks.

Asked if they could sort anything out and Robbie offered to sell me one of the V5 prototypes he flew in Mountain Trails.

Who would say "No" to that ?

Awesome service from PF :)

Out to Empuria on Thursday so hopefully I'll be jumping it next week.

p.s. the air scoops in front of the shoulders look big enough to swallow small birds...
Jump more, post less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The Apache in that light looks a lot like the CCPF (a fun big wing experiment we did at PF over 4 years ago, pic pic), almost 2 years prior to the creation of the suits you mention. Who copied who? Or was there copying involved? I think the answer to both questions is a lot simpler.

When looking at the basic outline of any suit (be it the current big suits from Intrudair, S-Fly, PF, Tony or Squirrel) its easy to point and say 'copy'.
But give a 5 year old a picture of Patrick DeGuyardon's (in comparison) tiny wingsuit, and tell them to 'make it bigger' and you'll end up with the same rough outline most big suits sport these days. There are only so many (or should I say few) ways you can make armwings and legwings bigger. In the end, most 'big wings' will end up with roughly the same outline/shape. Is that copying or simply the limits of the human body as a basic frame to build around?

In terms of inlet design, they are not much different from what we've had on all previous versions of the suits, be it for some small changes.

Its the subtle differences in the suit that in the end determine handling, inflation, steering and more. With the new V's we think we have some new changes in design that are a great improvement/addition to the previous products we've released.

Exactly how these new suits vary from whats out there, we'll detail on the website once we go towards official release.



This is very well stated and of course your basic premise is reflected in high-performance aircraft and automobile design too; there is pretty much one optimal shape to accomplish shared design goals so naturally things are going to look generally the same and it's pretty silly to say who copied who because everyone is copying God or the Goddess or Nature or at the very least applying Physics 101 in a similar way.

And yes, the differences and distinctions lie in the details and combinations thereof, and that is where the real action is happening and I gotta tell you, all the jostling and tussling and smack talking inclusive, everybody out there who's going for it is contributing to the development of human flight on a scale undreamed of even a few decades ago - and I appreciate and applaud all of you for your work and drive and dedication.

And competitive spirit. Really, wanting to build a better suit is the way everybody gets better, the way we all fly farther, faster, with more precision and reliability and durability and everything else.

Sooooo, good on all of you out there designing them, building them, and/or flying them, and there's hardly a day that goes by that I don't think about how proud Carl and Patrick have to be as they look down, up or around at their heirs in the air -- and how pissed off they are that they aren't still around to play with all the new toys themselves.

B|
44
SCR-6933 / SCS-3463 / D-5533 / BASE 44 / CCS-37 / 82d Airborne (Ret.)

"The beginning of wisdom is to first call things by their right names."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0