Skip to Content

safety : General Safety : How Green Is My Skydive

How Green Is My Skydive

by Bryan Burke
Skydiving Article Image1
Images by Serge Shakuto

Friends, co-workers, and visitors to Skydive Arizona often comment on my interest in environmental topics and my rather restrained consumption of goods and energy, at least by American standards. This is in sharp contrast to my job, which is helping to run the biggest drop zone on the planet. I freely confess I have probably pumped more jet fuel into jump planes than anyone on earth. My fuel supplier is on speed dial and I order 8,000 gallons of jet fuel with a 15 second phone call. When things are busy I make that call two or three times a week. National Championships or Holiday Boogie busy? Every other day.

Yet we strive to keep our operations as efficient as possible. This is good business: burn less fuel, save money. Over time, every incremental gain in efficiency saves a few gallons of fuel here and there, just as people who plan their weekly driving to minimize miles and maximize efficiency will see huge savings over time, in thousands of small increments.

I reconcile my environmental leanings with my job in this manner: if someone else was doing it, a lot more fuel would be wasted. On a busy day I figure my expertise and commitment to efficiency saves Skydive Arizona at least two Otter loads worth of fuel consumption.

Just how much does our sport consume, and how does that compare to other ways oil is used or wasted? The numbers that follow are rough - sometimes very rough. Comparisons are difficult because as numbers get bigger and bigger, they tend to get harder to evaluate for accuracy. Even rough numbers will give the curious reader something to think about.

A Twin Otter burns about 30 gallons of jet fuel per load. If a drop zone operates at high efficiency, meaning most loads are close to full, that works out to about 1.4 to 1.5 gallons per jumper through the door. Other jump aircraft can be assumed to come in somewhere near that figure. A Cessna 182 burns a lot less per load in volume, but in terms of jumpers per load and time flown, they arenít that different. Single engine turbines are probably about as efficient as it gets. But on the other hand, if you lose an engine on an Otter, youíre still in an airplane. If you lose the engine on a PAC or Caravan, youíre in a glider. Thatís the main reason Skydive Arizona likes to run twin engine jump ships.

Gasoline turns into Carbon Dioxide at a rate of about one gallon into 20 pounds. Jet fuel is a little less clean, coming in at 21 pounds per gallon. Therefore, for every 100 jumps you make, about 140 gallons of fuel are burned, and 2,940 pounds of carbon dioxide are emitted. Thatís one and a half tons. Does your log book suddenly feel heavier?

If you are having trouble wrapping your head around this figure, think about the raw energy involved in getting to altitude for a skydive. Imagine climbing 13,000 feet on foot, say from the lowlands around Mt. Rainier to the summit, which is 14,411 feet above sea level. Skydive Arizona is 1,500 feet above sea level, so when your altimeter says 13,000 on jump run, youíre at about the same height as the summit of Mt. Rainier. It would take several days, lots of meals, and enormous effort to get to that summit on foot. We do it in 15 minutes using a jump plane. How? By turning long dead plants and animals into explosive energy funneled through a turbine engine.

By USPAís figures, approximately 3 million jumps per year were made in the USA between 2007 and 2016, which works out to 4,200,000 gallons of fuel and 88,200,000 pounds of CO2. Thatís 44,100 tons of CO2 emitted by skydiving in America each year. Multiply that by ten years and weíre talking about a lot of emissions!

Letís look even further back. Based on the jump estimates published in the April 2013 edition of Parachutist, annual jump numbers were at or below 2,000,000 until the late 80s, then climbed steadily throughout the 90s to their current levels. This makes sense. Prior to 1990, turbine aircraft were few, equipment less reliable and ďone size fits all,Ē and training less sophisticated. People packed their own rigs. The pace was just a lot slower. Improvements in all these areas allowed the sport to reach out to a much broader demographic, resulting in more jumps made.

Driven by curiosity I started pulling numbers off USPAís bar graph estimating number of jumps per year through 2013 and then added on through 2016. I made my best rounding-off estimate, coming up with about 70 million jumps in the history of US skydiving through 2016.

Obviously as data gets harder to read, or scarcer, numbers get fuzzier. Rough numbers suggest that about half of all jumps made in the world take place in the USA, so globally the skydiving total might come to about 140 million jumps made in the entire history of the sport.

That would mean that since 1960, the sport has burned through somewhere around 196,000,000 gallons of fuel, sending about 2,058,000 tons of CO2 out the exhaust pipes.

How do we stack up against other fuel figures?

The State of California estimates that 26,221,917 gallons per year are burned by Off Highway Vehicles, including motorcycles, ATVs, and snowmobiles. Thatís almost six times the total national fuel consumption for skydiving. Put another way, OHV recreation in California alone burns more than twice as much fuel as the entire worldís skydiving.

The Department of Defense is the worldís single largest buyer of fossil fuels, with an estimated consumption as high as 14 million gallons per day. Thatís more than all skydivers in the world use in a year and a half.

To fly Air Force 1 to Hawaii and back is about 50,000 gallons of fuel, or about 36,000 jumps Ė enough fuel to run a mid-sized seasonal drop zone for a year.

So much for motorized comparisons. Letís look at some other fossil fuel uses.

In my home state of Arizona coal-generated electrical power produced 33,402,462 tons of CO2 in the year 2016. In just one year, that works out to 16 times the entire skydiving fuel burn, globally, in all of history.

Skydiving Article Image2

The Earth Policy Institute estimates that Americaís bottled water demand requires 714,000,000 gallons of oil annually for materials, packing, storage, transport, and cooling. That works out to more than 80 years of jumps for the entire skydiving world at current levels of jumping.

In a more graphic image, the Pacific Institute says each bottle of drinking water would have to be filled about ľ of the way up with oil to represent the energy it used! A gallon is 3.8 liters (which makes one jump about 5.3 liters, donít you love math?) so you only need to drink about twenty-one 1-liter bottles of water or other beverages to waste as much oil as one skydive. Of course, this doesnít count the energy used to get you to the DZ and make your rig, jumpsuit, and accessory equipment. Or make the airplane, pave the runway, and put up the hangar.

Then comes the most disheartening element of fuel of all, the waste.

The Exxon Valdez spill released about 11,000,000 gallons of fuel over the space of a few days, enough to supply the entire global fleet of jump ships with fuel to fly for over a year. Exxon Valdez pales compared to the ten largest spills in history, all of which amounted to more than 45 million gallons each. The Deepwater Horizon spill alone was estimated to be approximately 200 million gallons, which would cover all the skydives ever made in the world, with about 30 million gallons left over for rigs and jumpsuits, and shipping them to customers.

Hereís my favorite. Around three billion gallons of gasoline are estimated to be wasted annually in the USA by cars idled in traffic congestion. If that amount was used for skydiving, the entire world could keep jumping at current levels for another 350 years. Daily fuel wasted in American traffic jams is the equivalent of almost six million jumps, or an entire year of the entire worldís estimated skydives.

I didnít bring up all these very dark comparisons to make skydiving look green against a black background. Thereís just no way we can rationalize skydiving into being green. To visualize just how much CO2 you generate on each jump, take that 29.4 pounds of CO2 and visualize it as six five-pound bags of charcoal briquets. Every jump, piling up on the DZ. If a bag of briquets is about one cubic foot, even a small drop zone would have a big pile out back. Skydive Arizona would have enough to fill four structures the size of the Colosseum of Rome, plus one Parthenon.

On the other hand, clearly skydiving is a small element of the whole picture. At the personal level, if you are the average American your annual car emissions are the equivalent of 340 skydives per year.

Even so, how can it be justified?

Philosophically, I do it this way. Play is a fundamental need coming in right after food, water, shelter, and security. Skydiving is high quality play, as good as it gets, but it comes with a cost. We canít eliminate that cost, but we can mitigate it by simply focusing on eliminating waste and inefficiency throughout our society and off-setting the damage through environmental restoration.

Wasteful use of oil, such as bottled water, cars stuck in traffic, industrial scale agriculture, consumer culture in general, and incredibly fuel consumptive military adventures around the globe are examples of where savings could be had. These require some personal and political commitment to steer away from a system that practically glorifies waste. Why not take that lesson skydiving with you? Maybe carpool to the DZ with a friend. Take an apartment closer to your job to avoid that wasteful commute or use mass transit to get to work. Buy a couple re-useable five-gallon water jugs to fill at a local water filtration facility, then refill smaller bottles from that rather than buying a pack of one-liter bottles for the weekend at the DZ. Set your air conditioning a little higher in summer and a little lower in winter. Make your driving as purposeful and efficient as possible by planning your errands carefully and buying a car that is practical rather than a statement about image.

Buy less stuff. Not only does stuff need to be moved from source to consumer, it must be mined, refined, transported to manufacturing plants, and so on. An I-phone 5S has a carbon footprint of 150 pounds - five skydives worth of fuel.

I find that visualization really helps me make immediate choices. If you visualize the bottom quarter of that throw-way beverage bottle as filled with bitter jet fuel that you must drink, youíll never want to touch it again. Sodas, same way. All that high fructose corn syrup was grown on highly mechanized farms before it was heated, treated, dyed, stuffed into a plastic bottle, and trucked to its air-conditioned home in a machine! When I contemplate a road trip, I visualize chucking a five-pound bag of charcoal out of my window every five miles and ask myself just how important that trip is to me. Itís harder to hide from the truth this way. Iíll still make the trip, but I allow myself only so much total annual fuel consumption Ė a budget, if you will Ė and making that trip will require that I tighten up consumption in other areas. Most Americans could reduce their overall consumption of energy, goods, and services by at least a third with a little thought and better practice.

Finally, donít waste money and fuel on lousy skydives! Focus on well planned jumps that have a high probability of success and the feeling of reward that comes with that. Youíll learn faster, be safer, and maybe be just a tiny bit greener too! Thereís an old saying, ďDirt dives are free.Ē Use your time on the ground wisely and your time in the air will be well spent.

By Bryan Burke on 2018-04-16 | Last Modified on 2018-04-23

Rating: 12345   Go Login to rate this article.  | Votes: 7 | Comments: 14 | Views: 5963


DBCOOPER  2018-04-16

I'm glad he left out beer...

peek  2018-04-16

Bryan, your knowledge and your skill at writing have combined once again to create an outstanding article. I don't know how you do it.

Anachronist  2018-04-16

Wow, there are so many citations for all that information I don't even know where to begin.

riggerrob  2018-04-16

Another brilliant analysis by Brian Burke

377  2018-04-17

Well written, thoughtful, hard data, zero self-serving rationalization. I am giving up bottled water to help compensate for my skydiving. I had no idea bottled water took so much oil. Tap H2O in my area is actually just fine. I am addicted to skydiving and can't quit, but I can quit bottled water. Can we do better? How about a big tethered balloon with a pulley attached? A ground mounted solar powered winch can take us up. ;)

bryanburke  2018-04-18

For base866, I have six rifles, two pistols, and a lot of reloading gear. That does not mean I oppose background checks and magazine capacity limits, and depriving people with documented social and mental disorders of their weapons. Read the 2nd Amendment. Note the capitalization of "Militia." Then, noting that the 2nd Amendment is an amendment to the body of the Constitution, go to the body. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15.

As with skydiving, for life in general I'm all about risk management.

In these interesting times it seems to me important that we evaluate every element of our lifestyles and social affiliations based on reasoned analysis of how we got here, where we are going, and what are the consequences of our actions.

There are people who deny climate change is a problem. I think any reasonable human being should give this some thought because the consequences are so significant. I like the attached video because it is so simple.

base866  2018-04-18

I bet you hate guns too, welcome to America I will start my fire tonight with jet-A to cook my steak just for you and shoot my AR right after, wake up simple ones, that 33 % of warming is a nice Freemason # and do your research smart one there are patents on 200+ MPG carberators and Hydrogen powered Airplanes since the 1930s but were hidden or scraped because of oil and this is fact, so go jump more and type less! Please

base866  2018-04-18

Sure he is American?

BeauRiebe  2018-04-18

Thanks for the excellent article. You made lots of great points, and I just want to also add that the animal agriculture industry is hugely detrimental to environmental sustainability. It's been estimated that 33% of the global warming effect can be attributed to animal agriculture. One pound of beef requires over 1,800 gallons of water to produce! Like Bryan says, be conscious of what you're doing. How can you offset your love of jumping? I'm not saying don't ever eat meat - just perhaps eat less of it?

base866  2018-04-19

There’s a few of you that need to move on out!

nettenette  2018-04-19
5 out of 5 stars

Killed it, Bryan! Thanks for taking the time to write this much-needed and solidly reasoned piece. <3 (And I agree with @BeauRibe on all points!)

base866  2018-04-19

Wow lol, bah, bah bah go leave this on a liberal website because every or almost every Veteran that has fought for your right to talk about taking more of our rights away (high cap mags and right to burn my Jet fuel) would and are on my side there smart one so move to a communist country and quit skydiving please stop Polluting the sky and our website with useless crap

377  2018-05-04

"...there are patents on 200+ MPG carberators" Patents are public documents, with full text and drawings freely available on the Internet. There are only so many BTUs in a gallon of fuel. No fuel metering or combustion enhancement system can change that number. I don't like limits, but they exist nevertheless.

base283  2018-06-02

I can¬īt find any data that today¬īs CO2 levels are detrimental. Do you have any links to the data? Anyone else? It¬īs for my personal use.
Thanks in advance,
Take care.

More articles in this category: