Contact Congress to Oppose User Fees for General Aviation
Among the discussions currently taking place in Washington, D.C., about reducing the deficit and finding new revenue streams is talk about imposing new user fees on general aviation. There has been similar talk in the past, but Congress squashed the idea. There’s not yet any formal proposal, but there are enough rumors from official sources that many of the general aviation associations representing pilots and businesses that operate aircraft have asked their members to contact their Senators and Member of Congress to oppose the idea. General aviation users already contribute to the aviation trust fund by paying a federal tax on every gallon of fuel purchased, and general aviation users want to stay with that method.
The basic idea of a user fee is to charge aircraft operators a set fee per flight. The charge could be anywhere from $25 to $100, and it could be assessed per takeoff or per radio contact with air traffic control (ATC). Skydiving operators—with multiple takeoffs each day and a requirement to contact ATC on each flight—would pay more than most operators; the cost of jump tickets would go up. A new fee could be aimed at jets only, or it could be aimed at all turbine aircraft, or all aircraft in commercial operation, or simply all aircraft. Regardless, if enacted, it is a sure bet that the fee would eventually increase and also be expanded to other users in the future. Adding insult to injury is that the FAA would have to create a sub-agency to track billing and enforce payment.
USPA joins our general aviation brethren in fighting the user fee concept. Please take action now to ensure that Congress rejects the user fee idea.
On the Senate website, select your state from a dropdown menu in the upper right corner to be directed to your two Senators’ contact information. On the House of Representatives website, enter your zip code to be directed to your one Representative’s contact information. A phone call is best, followed by an email, and even a fax; mailed letters take too long to arrive. In your contact, identify yourself as an aviation user, and explain how increased costs would affect your participation in skydiving—an FAA aeronautical activity. Ask them to reject the idea of new user fees for general aviation and to continue the collection of federal taxes on aviation fuels.
The above article was taken from a USPS news release: www.uspa.org
1 Comment Add a Comment
|Here's a thought! Lets charge everyone $1.00 every time they use a public road that actually costed money to pave? Oh what's that? That would P!$$ off too many people?... yes right... lets find a smaller demographic to pick on... AHA!!! Aviation! THEIR costs aren't high enough as it is!|
Add a Comment
More articles in this category:
- SKYPRO: Amazing Mobile App for the Real Skydiver! - by Paul Karaffa (Posted: 2013-05-12)
- Canopies for Kids - by (Posted: 2013-02-21)
- Cypres 2 Service Bulletin - Jan 2013 - by (Posted: 2013-02-05)
- Employment Opportunity at Skydive Arizona - by (Posted: 2013-01-17)
- In-Flight HUD to Assist Wingsuit Pilots - by (Posted: 2012-10-19)
- Felix Baumgartner Sets Skydiving Record - by (Posted: 2012-10-14)
- Long Beach Resident to Receive National Skydiving Museum Trustees Award for Team80 - by (Posted: 2012-07-03)
- Eugene Skydivers files FAA part 16 complaint against City of Creswell and Airport - by (Posted: 2012-06-29)