Forums: Skydiving: Safety and Training:
Wing Loading

 


sinister69  (A 38927)

Nov 7, 2001, 6:43 AM
Post #1 of 6 (849 views)
Shortcut
Wing Loading Can't Post

Can someone give me an explanation of wing loading? I don't know what it is all about and I hear people talking about it all the time. I know it has to do with weight and all that.

Blue Skies!
Sinister69

A-38927


jfields  (C 33595)

Nov 7, 2001, 6:46 AM
Post #2 of 6 (844 views)
Shortcut
Re: Wing Loading [In reply to] Can't Post

http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forums/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=forumsafetytraining&Number=42929&page=1&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&part=


;-)


Oh yeah. This one too....

http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forums/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=forumsafetytraining&Number=38299&page=2&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&part=

Justin
My Homepage

(This post was edited by jfields on Nov 7, 2001, 12:47 AM)


Premier quade  (D 22635)
Moderator
Nov 7, 2001, 7:36 AM
Post #3 of 6 (832 views)
Shortcut
Re: Wing Loading [In reply to] Can't Post

Wing loading is the amount of weight that a wing is required to support aerodynamically. This is normally expressed (in the U.S. at least) as a ratio of pounds per square foot. For instance 1.3:1 would mean 1.3 pounds of weight is being supported by 1 foot of wing area. You'd speak that ratio as 1 point 3 to 1.

To arrive at these numbers, take the entire weight the wing needs to support, in our case we can use exit weight, and divide that by the area of the wing. A typical example might be a skydiver with an exit weight of 235 pounds. That weight includes EVERYTHING; skydiver, goggles, gloves, lead, rig and even the canopy itself.

If, for instance, that skydiver was planing on deploying a Spectre 190, then he'd have a wingloading of about 1.238:1.

This wingloading number is really only relevant to that particular model and size of canopy and would not give the same performace as a, for instance, Sabre 190. The two canopies would fly COMPLETELY differently even under the same wingloading.

Further, if the skydiver decided to downsize to a Spectre 170, he'd have a wingloading of about 1.382:1 and that canopy would also perform differently than if he'd increased his exit weight on his Spectre 190 to 262.65 pounds to give it the same wingloading.

Wingloading doesn't scale for performance issues.

Wingloading is only ONE factor in performance, however, generally speaking, lighter wingloadings can give softer and slower landings than higher wingloadings on the same model and size canopy.

Canopies are designed with a wingloading range in mind and moving to either extreme of too light or too heavy will degrade performance.

Check the manufacturer's recommendations.


Paul

http://futurecam.com/skydive.html


Premier SkymonkeyONE  (D 12501)

Nov 7, 2001, 8:03 AM
Post #4 of 6 (825 views)
Shortcut
Re: Wing Loading [In reply to] Can't Post

Nice explanation Paul. Did that make sense Nelson? As paul stated, it's only one method to determine how a parachute "ought" to act over your head. Different parachutes perform differently at the same wingload in most instances, but not so much that you cant use the number as a good benchmark.

Chuck

My webpage HERE


jumpervali  (D 19338)

Nov 7, 2001, 10:11 AM
Post #5 of 6 (804 views)
Shortcut
Re: Wing Loading [In reply to] Can't Post

You weigh total 200 lbs
You jump a canopy 150 sq ft.

200/150=1.33

Then you load 1.33 lbs. to 1 sq ft.
1.33 to 1
1.33:1
jumpervali



sinister69  (A 38927)

Nov 8, 2001, 9:38 AM
Post #6 of 6 (722 views)
Shortcut
Re: Wing Loading [In reply to] Can't Post

thank you all, that cleared up alot for me.

thanks

Blue Skies!
Sinister69

A-38927



Forums : Skydiving : Safety and Training

 


Search for (options)