I have never seen a slider with plastic grommets. Brass? Yes! Stainless steel? Yes! Aluminum? Yes! But never plastic
I was thinking the same thing.. Then I had a moment of semi-brilliance... Maybe he was thinking the slider stops? I seem to recall that Aerodyne was using plastic stops as opposed to PD (not sure what they are using)... But, I've been wrong before...
Aug 24, 2012, 12:51 PM
Post #11 of 20
(902 views)
Shortcut
Re: [scottd818] PD reserve vs Aerodyne smart
[In reply to]
Can't Post
In reply to:
Has anyone flown both of these reserves that can compare how they fly and land?
I found my smart 120 easier to land than the PD126R I have number of jumps on (as a main). The smart seemed to open slower (was a low-speed malfunction). I liked both reserves, they're both better than other brands I've jumped. You cannot go wrong with either one IMO.
Aug 26, 2012, 11:35 AM
Post #16 of 20
(628 views)
Shortcut
Re: [md202089] PD reserve vs Aerodyne smart
[In reply to]
Can't Post
Hi
Please consider the limits:
SMART R: Deployments: 10 Repacks: 20 Which ever is first the Smart should go back to the mfg. for tests & recertification. No Box marking system on the canopy
PR / OP: Deployments: 25 Repacks: 40 Which ever is first the PR/OP must go back to PD for tests & recertification. Marking Box system on the canopy - easy track of history of Repacks / Deployments if were marked.
Aug 26, 2012, 12:33 PM
Post #18 of 20
(600 views)
Shortcut
Re: [RIGGER] PD reserve vs Aerodyne smart
[In reply to]
Can't Post
In reply to:
Hi
Please consider the limits:
SMART R: Deployments: 10 Repacks: 20 Which ever is first the Smart should go back to the mfg. for tests & recertification. No Box marking system on the canopy
PR / OP: Deployments: 25 Repacks: 40 Which ever is first the PR/OP must go back to PD for tests & recertification. Marking Box system on the canopy - easy track of history of Repacks / Deployments if were marked.
Both will save you when needed.
Cheers
The smart manual only says that porosity should be checked after 10 deployments/20 repacks, but it doesn't say how to check the porosity or that it must be done by the mfg (page 20 of their manual). Perhaps there is something else in the manual I overlooked.
Aug 26, 2012, 2:52 PM
Post #19 of 20
(545 views)
Shortcut
Re: [RIGGER] PD reserve vs Aerodyne smart
[In reply to]
Can't Post
In reply to:
Hi
Please consider the limits:
SMART R: Deployments: 10 Repacks: 20 Which ever is first the Smart should go back to the mfg. for tests & recertification. No Box marking system on the canopy
PR / OP: Deployments: 25 Repacks: 40 Which ever is first the PR/OP must go back to PD for tests & recertification. Marking Box system on the canopy - easy track of history of Repacks / Deployments if were marked.
Aug 26, 2012, 9:06 PM
Post #20 of 20
(489 views)
Shortcut
Re: [sundevil777] PD reserve vs Aerodyne smart
[In reply to]
Can't Post
Hi
You are correct - they never said how to perform the tests & who will perform it - this is a very good reason to sent it back to Aerodyne for the tests - at least it will come back certified by the MFG. & the owner knows the MFG. recertified his reserve after an APPROVED method of testing with the right tools.
PD reserve MUST be sent back to PD for that process.