Feb 3, 2010, 6:03 AM
Post #6 of 26
(1406 views)
Shortcut
Re: [AggieDave] "New Point spreas in Accuracy" More Info needed
[In reply to]
Can't Post
In reply to:
Wow. I guess they felt bad after G-dub had a perfect run!
This will be another interesting change to train for. Have we had two years in a row of the same rules in ZA?
We all felt bad. It was like: "Hey man, great job!! That was awesome!! ... now our scores are fucked, you fuck!!!"
But as far as "training for it" ... We all talked about the last years change, how it would affect things... But it's just a change in the rule regarding scoring... is it really affecting anything in the way you are going to swoop? The goal is still the same, the distance of the course is still the same... Simple concept - swoop all gates, land standing up on the middle, that's it. Sounds easy. What i am saying is - that's what you have to train for, not for a change in the rules.
(This post was edited by frost on Feb 3, 2010, 6:05 AM)
Feb 3, 2010, 12:35 PM
Post #7 of 26
(1351 views)
Shortcut
Re: [frost] "New Point spreas in Accuracy" More Info needed
[In reply to]
Can't Post
the lines may be moved around, but the high score is almost in the same place. with that logic you better get out there and train the new speed calcuation as well.
I'm gonna try and get the spreadsheets updated for the meet this weekend in z-hills. I'm gonna need a hand measuring out and marking the new accuracy zones on friday if someone can help.
ianmdrennan (D 25821)
Moderator
Feb 3, 2010, 12:47 PM
Post #8 of 26
(1348 views)
Shortcut
Re: [berchtoldaj] "New Point spreas in Accuracy" More Info needed
[In reply to]
Feb 3, 2010, 1:22 PM
Post #9 of 26
(1334 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ianmdrennan] "New Point spreas in Accuracy" More Info needed
[In reply to]
Can't Post
which diagram will be used out of the two attached here so far? The second one has 2 zones to get a perfect score now that's interesting. What everyone thinks about this set up with 2 possibilities for a perfect score?
ianmdrennan (D 25821)
Moderator
Feb 3, 2010, 1:27 PM
Post #10 of 26
(1330 views)
Shortcut
Re: [skyshimas] "New Point spreas in Accuracy" More Info needed
[In reply to]
Can't Post
The first one since it matches Wuzi's description.
The 2nd one is definitely not right
(This post was edited by ianmdrennan on Feb 3, 2010, 1:27 PM)
Feb 3, 2010, 8:18 PM
Post #12 of 26
(1284 views)
Shortcut
Re: [piahenzi] "New Point spreas in Accuracy" More Info needed
[In reply to]
Can't Post
In reply to:
AAAAAK!!!! Crazy .... Here we go again... I feel a looooooong briefing coming on at the pond. I guess we'll meet up at 7 AM ??
looks pretty simple to me?
Same method of performing the round but with different scoring. With that scoring system I would have got much more respectable results in my last comp in the accuracy rounds, but so would everyone else I suppose?
Mar 24, 2010, 10:26 PM
Post #22 of 26
(943 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ianmdrennan] "New Point spreas in Accuracy" More Info needed
[In reply to]
Can't Post
"Now the scores are multiplied by 5, divided by 3, and then calculated as a percentage of the best score." Are you sure about this? Because this wouldn´t make sense at all, think about it... can you find the mistake...?
Mar 26, 2010, 4:33 PM
Post #25 of 26
(827 views)
Shortcut
Re: [morris] "New Point spreas in Accuracy" More Info needed
[In reply to]
Can't Post
In reply to:
"Now the scores are multiplied by 5, divided by 3, and then calculated as a percentage of the best score." Are you sure about this? Because this wouldn´t make sense at all, think about it... can you find the mistake...?
"Well, it's real simple: basically, there's three grabbers, three taggers, five twig-runners, and the player at whack-bat. The center-tagger lights the pine-cone and chucks it over the basket, and the whack-batter tries to hit the cedar-stick off the cross-rock. Then the twig-runners dash back and forth until the pine-cone burns out, and the umpire calls "hot box". Finally, at the end you count up however many score-downs it adds up to and divide that by nine."
But yeah, the maths as described does not appear to make sense.