Forums: Skydiving: Skydiving History & Trivia:
DB Cooper

 

First page Previous page 1 ... 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 ... 2219 Next page Last page  View All

mrshutter45

Dec 9, 2012, 7:53 PM
Post #38801 of 55463 (35611 views)
Shortcut
Re: [RobertMBlevins] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

well, good for you, I guess, I still don't see the connection, but, one must try I guess. all I can say is this Cool

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-ZpHr5l0U0


skyjack71

Dec 9, 2012, 8:42 PM
Post #38802 of 55463 (35557 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mrshutter45] Alcatraz [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
"I am going to attach 2 photos.
One of Ed and one of Anglin

There is a similarity in the chin and mouth - not many people hold their mouths like that. The ahape of the head is right. "

what exactly is your intention to this description?

"IF you cannot follow my ramblings" then I must follow everyone's ramblings? rambling is not truth Jo!!

where is the mention of "I mention that Anglin was only 31"?? ok, sorry I see that now, but explain the rest?


I am only 10 yrs older than this Anglin brother! Therefore I am able to associate the age brackets. IT was NOT uncommon in "the day" of a 31 yr old to be married to a 16 yr old, and Zona was born sometime between 1943 and 1946...which was age appropriate for some one born in 1931 in those days.
Today if a 24 yr old dates a 18 yr old and have sex - look out! She is considered a juvenile and all she has to do is scream RAPE and the poor guy is labeled for the rest of his life. Todays 16 yr olds are very immature but also very promiscuous.

Most 24 yr olds men are NOT interest in 24 yr old females. Like the typical male thing - they like their women younger, but with the laws today - the 24 yr serving his country - can't date an age appropriate young lady

Duane had friends much younger than he was and such was with a man he introduced me to out of CO and in N.Orleans. His friend in GA was much younger.

I was playing with ways the same Zona could be connected with all 3 of them - only because Duane aske ED how Zona was doing. I did NOT at the time Duane's daughter was named ZONA. We had only been married for a few weeks when I met Ed in Denver.

NOW do you GET IT. Also ED was younger than Duane, but he was in poor health - I don't know how much younger. I was a 17 yrs younger than Duane and many of his friends were MY age.


(This post was edited by skyjack71 on Dec 9, 2012, 8:52 PM)


RobertMBlevins

Dec 9, 2012, 8:43 PM
Post #38803 of 55463 (35555 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mrshutter45] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
well, good for you, I guess, I still don't see the connection, but, one must try I guess. all I can say is this Cool

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-ZpHr5l0U0

Thank you for the vote of luck.

Robert's Self Check-in at the Reality Hotel: I know perfectly well the report and the docs/pictures can't prove Kenny was the hijacker. What I'm hoping is that the Seattle FBI will finally take a look at him and find out how in the holy hell Christiansen managed to do the things he did between April and October of 1972. If they actually do an investigation and question the witnesses, they will find out one of two things:

1) Kenny got that $21,000 in cash he spent in that time period from the proceeds of the hijacking. That he spent this money can be proven beyond a doubt.

2) The money came from somewhere else, and he wasn't the hijacker.


(This post was edited by RobertMBlevins on Dec 9, 2012, 8:44 PM)


mrshutter45

Dec 9, 2012, 8:47 PM
Post #38804 of 55463 (35549 views)
Shortcut
Re: [skyjack71] Alcatraz [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
"I am going to attach 2 photos.
One of Ed and one of Anglin

There is a similarity in the chin and mouth - not many people hold their mouths like that. The ahape of the head is right. "

what exactly is your intention to this description?

"IF you cannot follow my ramblings" then I must follow everyone's ramblings? rambling is not truth Jo!!

where is the mention of "I mention that Anglin was only 31"?? ok, sorry I see that now, but explain the rest?


I am only 10 yrs older than this Anglin brother! Therefore I am able to associate the age brackets. IT was NOT uncommon in "the day" of a 31 yr old to be married to even a 16 yr old, and Zona was born sometime between 1943 and 1946...which was age appropriate for some one born in 1931 in those days.
Today if a 24 yr old dates a 18 yr old and they have sex - look out! All she has she is considered a juvenile is scream RAPE and the poor guy is labeld for the rest of his life.

Most 24 yr old are NOT interest in 24 yr old female. Like the typical male thing - they like their women younger, but with the laws today - the 24 yr serving his country - can't date an age appropriate young lady

Duane had friends much younger than he was and such was with a man he introduced me to out of CO and in N.Orleans. His friend in GA was much younger.

I was playing with ways the same Zona could be connected with all 3 of them - only because Duane aske ED how Zona was doing. I did NOT at the time know his daughters name was ZONA.

NOW do you GET IT. Also ED was younger than Duane, but he was in poor health - I don't know how much younger. I was a 17 yrs younger than Duane and many of his friends were MY age.

I retracted the reply of you stating 31, I'm still confused on how you assume everything revolves around Duane? please advise as to where you stated 31?.... Jo stated ".I mention that Anglin was only 31"??


(This post was edited by mrshutter45 on Dec 9, 2012, 8:52 PM)
Attachments: confused.JPG (137 KB)


skyjack71

Dec 9, 2012, 8:57 PM
Post #38805 of 55463 (35532 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mrshutter45] Alcatraz [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
"I am going to attach 2 photos.
One of Ed and one of Anglin

There is a similarity in the chin and mouth - not many people hold their mouths like that. The ahape of the head is right. "

what exactly is your intention to this description?

"IF you cannot follow my ramblings" then I must follow everyone's ramblings? rambling is not truth Jo!!

where is the mention of "I mention that Anglin was only 31"?? ok, sorry I see that now, but explain the rest?


I am only 10 yrs older than this Anglin brother! Therefore I am able to associate the age brackets. IT was NOT uncommon in "the day" of a 31 yr old to be married to even a 16 yr old, and Zona was born sometime between 1943 and 1946...which was age appropriate for some one born in 1931 in those days.
Today if a 24 yr old dates a 18 yr old and they have sex - look out! All she has she is considered a juvenile is scream RAPE and the poor guy is labeld for the rest of his life.

Most 24 yr old are NOT interest in 24 yr old female. Like the typical male thing - they like their women younger, but with the laws today - the 24 yr serving his country - can't date an age appropriate young lady

Duane had friends much younger than he was and such was with a man he introduced me to out of CO and in N.Orleans. His friend in GA was much younger.

I was playing with ways the same Zona could be connected with all 3 of them - only because Duane aske ED how Zona was doing. I did NOT at the time know his daughters name was ZONA.

NOW do you GET IT. Also ED was younger than Duane, but he was in poor health - I don't know how much younger. I was a 17 yrs younger than Duane and many of his friends were MY age.

I retracted the reply of you stating 31, I'm still confused on how you assume everything revolves around Duane? please advise as to where you stated 31?.... Jo stated ".I mention that Anglin was only 31"??


Last night I was having a lot of connection problems and I would make a post and it would NOT post. I would go back and my post would not be there - but, perhaps I should have CLARIFIED IT with that post.

I did state in a post that Anglin was only 31 - if it posted I know not and I stopped going back to check them. I assure you I was quiet well aware of the statment in the thread that he was 31 yrs of age.


mrshutter45

Dec 9, 2012, 8:59 PM
Post #38806 of 55463 (35529 views)
Shortcut
Re: [RobertMBlevins] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

nothing personal, just seems far fetched to think you hold the key to this crazy case we call DB Cooper, many claim Marla is nuts, Jo is nuts, cook is nuts etc etc.......Cool


mrshutter45

Dec 9, 2012, 9:06 PM
Post #38807 of 55463 (35523 views)
Shortcut
Re: [skyjack71] Alcatraz [In reply to] Can't Post

Jo, your statement reads as follows: Referencing the brothers - did YOU even READ what the FRIGGIN HELL I wrote. I mention that Anglin was only 31 and Zona - Duane's daughter was maybe 18 to 20 - so NOW do YOU GET IT!

this was like an hour ago???
please advise? if I'm wrong, please show the post?

medication and connection problems could lead us to a Conspiracy theory wouldn't you say???


(This post was edited by mrshutter45 on Dec 9, 2012, 9:17 PM)


skyjack71

Dec 9, 2012, 9:19 PM
Post #38808 of 55463 (35505 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mrshutter45] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
nothing personal, just seems far fetched to think you hold the key to this crazy case we call DB Cooper, many claim Marla is nuts, Jo is nuts, cook is nuts etc etc.......Cool

You think I don't look at how the world looks at this - especially people who DO not know me?

Oh! That poor woman is delusional or crazy! She is a liar and fantasy story teller.

I will tell you WHY I keep on - because the things I tell are real and they are NOT made up. NO I am NOT delusional and I am NOT a liar. I have offered to prove this - but, the FBI does NOT want that to happen. Now it has been so many yrs it won't happen because the test would not be valid at this stage.

I created a problem for the FBI - they want to bury this, but NO one counted on my MEMORY being as vivid as it is. I spent over 5k to go to WA in 2010 (money I could ill afford to spend), but I had to make that trip hoping that I could WALK away, but the trip ONLY ENFORCED everything I had told and tried to tell the FBI and others.

Instead of coming home and being able to WALK away - it didn't happen. I learned that JT had DELIVERATELY lied to me about many important facts - things that put my life in TURMOIL for several yrs. From 1996 until I came back from the first trip (short and paid for by a TV company in 2001) and learned on the last day after the crew left that JT had deliberately mislea\d me and that alone left a huge QUESTION MARK!

He had NO idea I was continueing my search and he thought I had just gone away until he found out I was posting on this thread - THEN here he comes again with his horrid attacks on me - VERBAL attacks and threats which actually put me in the ER twice.

WHY did he attack a person on the phone and on a thread? I will leave the answers to that - to your own research into this. I contacted him after the 2001 trip and told him what I thought of him and had NO further contact until the day he found me on this thread - he went right back into attack and destory mode.

NO HUMAN BEING would continue on as I have done -unless they knew what they had to say was real. If I was delusional or actually out of my mind, do you think my family and friends would not have had me committed by now. BECAUSE anyone who knows me knows the story I have told I could NOT possibly have made up - that I actually lived this.

They WISH I would let it go and I have tried - but, it is just not fair that the truth be buried forever.
.

Hell the more I say the crazier the world thinks I am.


(This post was edited by skyjack71 on Dec 9, 2012, 9:40 PM)


mrshutter45

Dec 9, 2012, 9:37 PM
Post #38809 of 55463 (35493 views)
Shortcut
Re: [skyjack71] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

Jo, nobody is calling you a liar! your perception of truth comes into question by claiming the smallest fact/clue revolving around Duane! he was a criminal period, known to lie, deceive, things Duane did is not as "out of the norm" as one would think when speaking about his past! perhaps you are just so "in the dark" you fail to see the light, I just don't know. I don't have anything against you, but, I just don't see any reason for the theories you claim! how can all the others be wrong just because Duane told you? believe it or not, you are in that category you suppress !!


skyjack71

Dec 9, 2012, 10:01 PM
Post #38810 of 55463 (35496 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mrshutter45] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
Jo, nobody is calling you a liar! your perception of truth comes into question by claiming the smallest fact/clue revolving around Duane! he was a criminal period, known to lie, deceive, things Duane did is not as "out of the norm" as one would think when speaking about his past! perhaps you are just so "in the dark" you fail to see the light, I just don't know. I don't have anything against you, but, I just don't see any reason for the theories you claim! how can all the others be wrong just because Duane told you? believe it or not, you are in that category you suppress !!

Definitely NOT in THE DARK Darling, I am quiet well aware of the fact that he was a thief and an excon and known to lie. With me it was lie by ommision and telling me about himself in the third party.

Believe me I am NOT in the DARK!

Yes I chase theories - why not?

If you think I am like Marla she hears something and then suddenly she she changes her story to match the infomation.

NO way! I have told most things over and over from the very beginning and I mean before I ever talked to a TV program or the media. If you are thinking the Zona thing is NEW - think again? IT is not - I questioned this many many yrs ago. I found it on my own tracking down things Duane had told me over the yrs of our marriage...and I have the files to prove it. 85% of this was prior to my ever having access to a computer.


skyjack71

Dec 9, 2012, 10:17 PM
Post #38811 of 55463 (35490 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mrshutter45] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
Jo, nobody is calling you a liar! your perception of truth comes into question by claiming the smallest fact/clue revolving around Duane! he was a criminal period, known to lie, deceive, things Duane did is not as "out of the norm" as one would think when speaking about his past! perhaps you are just so "in the dark" you fail to see the light, I just don't know. I don't have anything against you, but, I just don't see any reason for the theories you claim! how can all the others be wrong just because Duane told you? believe it or not, you are in that category you suppress !!


Go back and read the post Jerry made.

You don't see a reason because YOU don't know me and the theories are just that. The ZONA thing is not a theory - finding out the reason Ed and Duane talked about Zona needs to be known.
And Duane said something regarding the Alcatraz thing and WHY I had knowledge of this before you came up with it and someone else in the thread before you. Perhaps it was ONE of his con-man lies - but, remember I did not know he was a con. He couldn't tell me he met someone in a jail cell. He couldn't tell me individuals he introduced me to he had known from a prison.

The FBI does NOT see fit that the public know who ED was! Why because he was in the same category as Duane - whatever that category was.

If the FBI actually went to talk to Tommy - why NOT make it public? WHY hide the interview? They make everything public now why from me about the past and individuals who are now deceased. WHY? Because they never interviewed these individuals.

Finding ED was NOT secret. The FBI could have done it easy, but I was NOT allowed access to private employement information. Yet the FBI could have made his background and statement public with his permission or they could have provided him with my information so HE could explain who Zona was and what he knew about Duane.


BELIEVE ME - I am not in the category with the writers who do research and try to sell a story nor and I someone looking for attention and to twist my butt all over. I kept my visit to WA a secret - because I was looking for TRUTHS and trying TO find out if MY memories could be false as JT tried to convince me.

WELL, lo and behold I find out JT was the one with the stories- but WHY? WHY did his man go to such efforts to discredit me and make my life horrible? WHY?

NOW that one is a sad sad case and I really feel sorry for the guy but he has never cared about me or the truth....just how much he could badger someone and be heard.


mrshutter45

Dec 9, 2012, 10:25 PM
Post #38812 of 55463 (35484 views)
Shortcut
Re: [skyjack71] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

Jo, what strong evidence do you have Duane is DB Cooper?
yes, everyone chases's theories!
was Duane outside of prison in the NW?
where was Duane November 24,1971?
can you match the evidence with held about the jacking?
screw the prints and DNA?
what do you know the FBI doesn't?
these guy's hold the key, you have it?


RobertMBlevins

Dec 9, 2012, 10:45 PM
Post #38813 of 55463 (35469 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mrshutter45] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
nothing personal, just seems far fetched to think you hold the key to this crazy case we call DB Cooper, many claim Marla is nuts, Jo is nuts, cook is nuts etc etc.......Cool

For the record:

I don't think Marla is nuts. I think she has ADD and is an opportunist.

I don't believe Jo is nuts, either. She could even be right. But you need evidence to prove a case, or at least some witnesses who might be able to further that case a bit.

Cook isn't nuts. But he's motivated to somehow prove Gossett was the hijacker, even if he has go out on some nutty limbs in the attempt. The Janet Fable, etc. All the guy has to really do is interview the people who worked with Gossett at Fort Lewis around the time of the hijacking, and he hasn't done that. This is counterproductive to his appearances on Coast-to-Coast radio, since he might find out that Gossett was Present and Accounted For at the time of the crime. Can't have that happen...Crazy


(This post was edited by RobertMBlevins on Dec 9, 2012, 10:47 PM)


mrshutter45

Dec 9, 2012, 11:05 PM
Post #38814 of 55463 (35452 views)
Shortcut
Re: [RobertMBlevins] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

ask yourself this Robert, you made many claims that Marla was deceptive about who Cooper was correct? isn't this the same as calling her claims nuts? stop with the political correctness BS already,shall we? this is killing this County IMO!!


georger

Dec 9, 2012, 11:09 PM
Post #38815 of 55463 (35447 views)
Shortcut
Re: [RobertMBlevins] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
nothing personal, just seems far fetched to think you hold the key to this crazy case we call DB Cooper, many claim Marla is nuts, Jo is nuts, cook is nuts etc etc.......Cool

For the record:

I don't think Marla is nuts. I think she has ADD and is an opportunist.

I don't believe Jo is nuts, either. She could even be right. But you need evidence to prove a case, or at least some witnesses who might be able to further that case a bit.

Cook isn't nuts. But he's motivated to somehow prove Gossett was the hijacker, even if he has go out on some nutty limbs in the attempt. The Janet Fable, etc. All the guy has to really do is interview the people who worked with Gossett at Fort Lewis around the time of the hijacking, and he hasn't done that. This is counterproductive to his appearances on Coast-to-Coast radio, since he might find out that Gossett was Present and Accounted For at the time of the crime. Can't have that happen...Crazy

Everyone is nuts except RobertMBlevins aka 'Marilyn
Monroe'.

Blevins is just jealous and in need of a personality
transplant!

Sly


RobertMBlevins

Dec 9, 2012, 11:18 PM
Post #38816 of 55463 (35443 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mrshutter45] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
ask yourself this Robert, you made many claims that Marla was deceptive about who Cooper was correct? isn't this the same as calling her claims nuts? stop with the political correctness BS already,shall we? this is killing this County IMO!!

I presented evidence that Marla has changed her story to fit the circumstances, and viewed the Cooper case as her personal media platform leading to a big advance and a book by a major publisher.

One is true, the other never happened. You can decide which one is which. Smile

I will give anyone the benefit of the doubt, even Jo Weber, as long as they aren't deliberately making stuff up to further a means to an end. You can be wrong, but lying is something else entirely. Have to draw the line somewhere. There's enough BS going on the Cooper case already.


(This post was edited by RobertMBlevins on Dec 10, 2012, 12:31 AM)


BruceSmith

Dec 9, 2012, 11:26 PM
Post #38817 of 55463 (35437 views)
Shortcut
An Introduction to the Case and the Mystery [In reply to] Can't Post

Greetings Everyone,

With the flurry of activity surrounding the case over the past couple of weeks, I've decided to reframe the opening chapter of my book. The new chapter is posted at the Mountain News, and if you'd like to take a look at it, I'd welcome your comments.

Thanks,

-Bruce

http://themountainnewswa.net/...ase-and-the-mystery/


RobertMBlevins

Dec 9, 2012, 11:29 PM
Post #38818 of 55463 (35433 views)
Shortcut
Re: [BruceSmith] An Introduction to the Case and the Mystery [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
Greetings Everyone,

With the flurry of activity surrounding the case over the past couple of weeks, I've decided to reframe the opening chapter of my book. The new chapter is posted at the Mountain News, and if you'd like to take a look at it, I'd welcome your comments.

Thanks,

-Bruce

http://themountainnewswa.net/...ase-and-the-mystery/

I did read it. You need a good editor and a title change, that's my advice.

Ditch 'The Hunt for DB Cooper' since it's already been used by Geoff Gray.

Pro edit and format, six/nine paperback with B/W images, Amazon Kindle in color. This can be done by any number of people in the Puget Sound area. Smile


(This post was edited by RobertMBlevins on Dec 9, 2012, 11:33 PM)


BruceSmith

Dec 9, 2012, 11:43 PM
Post #38819 of 55463 (35424 views)
Shortcut
Gossett's alibi [In reply to] Can't Post

Cook isn't nuts. But he's motivated to somehow prove Gossett was the hijacker, even if he has go out on some nutty limbs in the attempt. The Janet Fable, etc. All the guy has to really do is interview the people who worked with Gossett at Fort Lewis around the time of the hijacking, and he hasn't done that. This is counterproductive to his appearances on Coast-to-Coast radio, since he might find out that Gossett was Present and Accounted For at the time of the crime. Can't have that happen...Crazy

Can you elaborate on this please, Robert? Where was Wolfgang Gossett on November 24, 1971, and how do you know it?

Thanks.


RobertMBlevins

Dec 9, 2012, 11:46 PM
Post #38820 of 55463 (35420 views)
Shortcut
Re: [BruceSmith] Gossett's alibi [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
Cook isn't nuts. But he's motivated to somehow prove Gossett was the hijacker, even if he has go out on some nutty limbs in the attempt. The Janet Fable, etc. All the guy has to really do is interview the people who worked with Gossett at Fort Lewis around the time of the hijacking, and he hasn't done that. This is counterproductive to his appearances on Coast-to-Coast radio, since he might find out that Gossett was Present and Accounted For at the time of the crime. Can't have that happen...Crazy

Can you elaborate on this please, Robert? Where was Wolfgang Gossett on November 24, 1971, and how do you know it?

Thanks.
I don't know where he was. Neither does anyone else so far. That's the point. Gossett was active duty military at the time of the hijacking, though.

It's Cook's job to answer that question, right? You should be asking him.

EDIT: Seattle Seahawks 58, Arizona Cardinals 0.

This franchise-record win was only overshadowed by Kirk Collins' and RG3's effort against the Ravens. True NFL fans need no further explanation.
It was a good week.

On December 23rd, the SF 49'rs come to Seattle, and Seattle is looking for a little payback. You can bet on it.

Celebrate with Creedence and crank it up. Cool


(This post was edited by RobertMBlevins on Dec 10, 2012, 12:30 AM)


skyjack71

Dec 10, 2012, 12:22 AM
Post #38821 of 55463 (35400 views)
Shortcut
Re: [RobertMBlevins] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
nothing personal, just seems far fetched to think you hold the key to this crazy case we call DB Cooper, many claim Marla is nuts, Jo is nuts, cook is nuts etc etc.......Cool

For the record:

I don't think Marla is nuts. I think she has ADD and is an opportunist.

I don't believe Jo is nuts, either. She could even be right. But you need evidence to prove a case, or at least some witnesses who might be able to further that case a bit.

Cook isn't nuts. But he's motivated to somehow prove Gossett was the hijacker, even if he has go out on some nutty limbs in the attempt. The Janet Fable, etc. All the guy has to really do is interview the people who worked with Gossett at Fort Lewis around the time of the hijacking, and he hasn't done that. This is counterproductive to his appearances on Coast-to-Coast radio, since he might find out that Gossett was Present and Accounted For at the time of the crime. Can't have that happen...Crazy

Congratulation Blevins, you actually summed up Cook as unobjective as any of us could do and you did it better than anyone else has.

One Post and you said a lot with out ONE word about the book.
Now if I could post without talking about Weber - we might get somewhere. I try!


MeyerLouie

Dec 10, 2012, 2:17 AM
Post #38822 of 55463 (35347 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mrshutter45] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
nothing personal, just seems far fetched to think you hold the key to this crazy case we call DB Cooper, many claim Marla is nuts, Jo is nuts, cook is nuts etc etc.......Cool
__________________________________________________

mrshutter45,

While I respect your work and talents you've brought to the case, I think this post is quite unkind toward Jo. Jo has every right to post her theory, ideas, and thoughts, without the unkind labels -- just like everybody else here. MeyerLouie


MeyerLouie

Dec 10, 2012, 3:04 AM
Post #38823 of 55463 (35334 views)
Shortcut
Re: [georger] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
nothing personal, just seems far fetched to think you hold the key to this crazy case we call DB Cooper, many claim Marla is nuts, Jo is nuts, cook is nuts etc etc.......Cool

For the record:

I don't think Marla is nuts. I think she has ADD and is an opportunist.

I don't believe Jo is nuts, either. She could even be right. But you need evidence to prove a case, or at least some witnesses who might be able to further that case a bit.

Cook isn't nuts. But he's motivated to somehow prove Gossett was the hijacker, even if he has go out on some nutty limbs in the attempt. The Janet Fable, etc. All the guy has to really do is interview the people who worked with Gossett at Fort Lewis around the time of the hijacking, and he hasn't done that. This is counterproductive to his appearances on Coast-to-Coast radio, since he might find out that Gossett was Present and Accounted For at the time of the crime. Can't have that happen...Crazy

Everyone is nuts except RobertMBlevins aka 'Marilyn
Monroe'.

Blevins is just jealous and in need of a personality
transplant!

Sly

I must admit Blevins, that thought has crossed my mind -- are you jealous? You came around like 3 or so years ago, you were here for such a short time, then you co-wrote a book and you appeared on the History Channel -- and somehow I get the feeling you think all that automatically puts you in the "DB Cooper Hall of Fame." You have repeated yourself and your theory so many times you've lost pretty much all credibility.

Moreover, I have seen you react, almost violently, to anyone who's thinking about coming out with a book. There's Marla, then there's Galen Cook, and there's Bruce Smith. You seem so threatened and jealous of anyone who might get something over on you or who might get more notoriety than you. I don't think anyone asked for your opinion on what Bruce should call his book. Brue can spreak for himself, but it seems your advice and criticism of Bruce's work were totally unsolicited. That's so blatantly arrogant, Blevins. Lighten up!! Quit trying so hard.

I met you Blevins. In real life you're a nice, respectful, and kind person -- I saw it with my own eyes. Why don't you try to be that person here? Nobody will fault you for that, and you just might get a better, more respectful response from people around here. Just be yourself. You can be a really good guy, Blevins.

Earning respect takes time. Only people who've been around for a long time and who have earned a good reputation by their body of work deserve our respect. And you will get no respect if you have no credibility and if you have not "put in your time and paid your dues."

MeyerLouie


mrshutter45

Dec 10, 2012, 8:37 AM
Post #38824 of 55463 (35301 views)
Shortcut
Re: [MeyerLouie] Something new for you folks [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
nothing personal, just seems far fetched to think you hold the key to this crazy case we call DB Cooper, many claim Marla is nuts, Jo is nuts, cook is nuts etc etc.......Cool
__________________________________________________

mrshutter45,

While I respect your work and talents you've brought to the case, I think this post is quite unkind toward Jo. Jo has every right to post her theory, ideas, and thoughts, without the unkind labels -- just like everybody else here. MeyerLouie

unfortunately I tend to get caught up in one subject when I disagree, I did say "claim to be nuts" vs nuts, I'm not actually implying that Jo,Marla and Cook are nuts. if that is how people are viewing this, I am sorry for the misrepresentation.

Jo tends to bring out the bad part in me causing me to go into a "Knoss attack" I still strongly object to Jo's findings, but do not believe she or the others mentioned are actually nuts!....again for the record I did say "many claim" as for Mr Cook, I don't even know enough about the mans work, so I simply implied the word nuts, Marla......well....best way to sum her up, is, MarlaWink
Jo, Blevins and Marla all have the same right as I do to post what ever they wish, I believe I told Blevins that same thing a couple post's back. In the future I will respectfully disagree, I do appreciate your coming forward and correcting my statement and will try a more mature approach the next time during battle. Cool

Thank You
Dave Brown


Amazon  (D License)

Dec 10, 2012, 9:39 AM
Post #38825 of 55463 (35289 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mrshutter45] I'd rather talk about Cooper than Cook and Blevins [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Note on computers, key is get all the GPU you can afford.Wink

blues jerry

I have a nvidia 1gig video card, not the best though. my processor was weak (AMD 2.61 GHZ) single core.

upgraded to 3.4 Pentium D dual core
better power supply for a better video card.
was maxed out at 2gigs memory. (old machine)
upgraded to 4 gigs, new puter allows up to 8 on 64 bit
this should be well in the limits of runing the system properly. the best option was to replace rather than
upgrading the processor, motherboard, power supply etc.

the system was running fine until I put upgrades onto the sim(addons) the final hit the machine took was
the new weather system addon. too many running programs for the processor Cool

It still is a bit lacking just sayin

I bought my lappie with the i7 and the 3D LED screen and built in NVIDIA 3D.. friggin AWSUMSmile


First page Previous page 1 ... 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 ... 2219 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Skydiving : Skydiving History & Trivia

 


Search for (options)