Forums: Skydiving Disciplines: Freeflying:
HUGE Freefly news

 


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Feb 19, 2012, 2:28 PM
Post #1 of 43 (6464 views)
Shortcut
HUGE Freefly news Can't Post

The USPA just approved OFFICIAL state and national sitfly formation records at the Board of Directors meeting. Steve Vogdes gave the presentation to the board and it was approved.

Plans for the first ever US National Sitfly Formation Record are in the works. More details to come.


Squeak  (E 1313)

Feb 20, 2012, 1:39 AM
Post #2 of 43 (6323 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Sounds good,
Didnt Amy Chemasexy already kick that arse last year in Eloy?


dqpacker  (D 32043)

Feb 20, 2012, 5:44 AM
Post #3 of 43 (6294 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

let's do something soon for the TX state record. that one jump we did that 6way no grip exit that built to 5 pretty quick. we could even go as far as getting oxygen and go higher for the attempts. we have the talent in the staff pool and the fun jumpers that we could try 12 or bigger no prob.


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Feb 20, 2012, 7:59 AM
Post #4 of 43 (6267 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Squeak] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
Sounds good,
Didnt Amy Chemasexy already kick that arse last year in Eloy?

Large Sitfly formations have been done here and there for fun, but at no point was it an official category for USPA state/national record keeping. Any previous claim to a sitfly formation record could only be unofficial and arguable. There weren't any official judges to validate the record against uniform guidelines.

There's a picture up in the Bent Prop of a large sitfly round Amy organized some time ago that would probably have counted towards something at the time, but it's tough to try and claim it afterward for a few reasons.

1) The new sitfly national records are still subject to the rules of other national records in that it must be judged and certified within 90 days of completing the formation.

2) The formation is supposed to be submitted to the judge for proposal before the formation is attempted showing who is in what slot with what grips. Some judges have been lax on this rule and there are some sneaky ways people have gotten around this (ie videoing the dirt dive and/or drawn formation prior to the jump when the judge was not immediately available).

The new sitfly records also come standard with 3 classes at both state and national level:
1) General
2) Womens
3) Collegiate

I'm going to be spending some time getting copes of the new revised reporting forms and working on the first National record attempt event for mid-late August on the east coast a few weeks after the new head down world record.


Rstanley0312  (D 31900)

Feb 20, 2012, 1:22 PM
Post #5 of 43 (6212 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Sounds good,
Didnt Amy Chemasexy already kick that arse last year in Eloy?

Large Sitfly formations have been done here and there for fun, but at no point was it an official category for USPA state/national record keeping. Any previous claim to a sitfly formation record could only be unofficial and arguable. There weren't any official judges to validate the record against uniform guidelines.

There's a picture up in the Bent Prop of a large sitfly round Amy organized some time ago that would probably have counted towards something at the time, but it's tough to try and claim it afterward for a few reasons.

1) The new sitfly national records are still subject to the rules of other national records in that it must be judged and certified within 90 days of completing the formation.

2) The formation is supposed to be submitted to the judge for proposal before the formation is attempted showing who is in what slot with what grips. Some judges have been lax on this rule and there are some sneaky ways people have gotten around this (ie videoing the dirt dive and/or drawn formation prior to the jump when the judge was not immediately available).

The new sitfly records also come standard with 3 classes at both state and national level:
1) General
2) Womens
3) Collegiate

I'm going to be spending some time getting copes of the new revised reporting forms and working on the first National record attempt event for mid-late August on the east coast a few weeks after the new head down world record.

Awesome.


stayhigh  (F 111)

Feb 20, 2012, 7:48 PM
Post #6 of 43 (6146 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

it is not gonna one of those, building a belly round and sitting it out right????

people should have freedom to choose the orientation to approach the formation but need to build the formation from sit.


ebusto  (C 38493)

Feb 20, 2012, 10:27 PM
Post #7 of 43 (6124 views)
Shortcut
Re: [stayhigh] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Agreed, that would be a lot more fun.


dqpacker  (D 32043)

Feb 21, 2012, 7:13 AM
Post #8 of 43 (6085 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

any word if there will be a record for biggest sit round?


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Feb 21, 2012, 8:55 AM
Post #9 of 43 (6064 views)
Shortcut
Re: [stayhigh] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

The new record reporting category is titled "Freeflying/Vertical Formation Skydiving, Largest Upright Formation" and will be judged by the same guidelines held in those to respective sections of SCM. What that means is that judging doesn't care how you build the formation, so long as you obtain a judgeable snapshot of the formation built all in the defined "upright" position. In other words, building the sit formation starting from the belly would be legal and it does not matter if it is a round or some fancy formation.

The ruling judges have not yet clarified whether the formation can include both "grips" and "foot grips" as defined, still waiting on that one.

Now it's not really my place to tell any of you guys how you should build your new state record formations, that's a judges job, but I can give you my predictions on what will probably happen.

In previous events when we've messed around with experimental upright formations, we've had exit and approach rules. But there was no real record to be had, so it was all in fun. Some required launching a sit base, and some (not naming names) went as far as ALL (purity) sitfly, ie exit/dive/approach all in sit and then turn/track all feet first. Now THAT is a lot harder and the ultimate goal was simply personal challenge. There aren't many who can be last diver to a formation, get to it purely feet first, close a pod on your feet, then track off feet first. But it's possible and has been done. Should we go that far to require that of our sit records?

Sure, in the beginning, I know people will be building belly rounds, flipping a sit, getting your defined snapshot and calling it your new record. Some won't like it but now that a real record is on the line and it's legal, I guarantee you people will do it. But for how long?

There comes a point when doing that isn't feasible anymore. Sure you could belly->sit a round with 10 people, 15, 20...? But what about 30? 50? 80? At some point there is just no way doing a belly->sit flip will work anymore. That's when we will eventually separate the kids from the adults.

So I'm not worried about it. I think it's much cooler to make it more challenging and build it purely vertical, and eventually that will be the only option anymore. I think when the new SCM gets released, you'll see a wave of initial records being set of people doing belly->sit rounds, once that wave is over, the REAL action will begin. Hell if it were my world, I'd ban HD flying on sit records!

Feet first flight for the future, fantastic!


kallend  (D 23151)

Feb 21, 2012, 1:01 PM
Post #10 of 43 (6030 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

 
What is the "defined 'upright' position"?


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Feb 21, 2012, 1:22 PM
Post #11 of 43 (6024 views)
Shortcut
Re: [kallend] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
What is the "defined 'upright' position"?

Defined by USPA:

C. Orientation:
1. “Relative wind” is defined as the direction from which the air appears to be coming due to the relative speed of the competitors in freefall.
2. “Head down” orientation consists of the competitor’s head having advanced further into the relative wind than the competitor’s feet by a significant amount, i.e., the length of the competitor’s torso; all distances and lengths are in terms of what is shown on the judging screen.
3. “Upright” orientation consists of the competitor’s head trailing behind the (average) position of the competitor’s feet by more than the length of the competitor’s torso; all distances and lengths are in terms of what is shown on the judging screen.

2011 SCM 9-1.10:C

The 2012 update will be released earliest May which will include the USPA winter BOD changes.


kallend  (D 23151)

Feb 21, 2012, 4:18 PM
Post #12 of 43 (5998 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
What is the "defined 'upright' position"?

Defined by USPA:

C. Orientation:
1. “Relative wind” is defined as the direction from which the air appears to be coming due to the relative speed of the competitors in freefall.
2. “Head down” orientation consists of the competitor’s head having advanced further into the relative wind than the competitor’s feet by a significant amount, i.e., the length of the competitor’s torso; all distances and lengths are in terms of what is shown on the judging screen.
3. “Upright” orientation consists of the competitor’s head trailing behind the (average) position of the competitor’s feet by more than the length of the competitor’s torso; all distances and lengths are in terms of what is shown on the judging screen.

2011 SCM 9-1.10:C

The 2012 update will be released earliest May which will include the USPA winter BOD changes.

So it could include "knee flying"? I've seen video of Airspeed doing a 10-way sequential while knee flying.


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Feb 21, 2012, 11:16 PM
Post #13 of 43 (5953 views)
Shortcut
Re: [kallend] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Ultimately that is up to the judges, but I would think yes. Modern VFS has incorporated lots of knee flying, daffy flying, full/partial stand flying while upright. Quite a few of the Airspeed crew are actually extremely talented freeflyers. Some are record holders in various head down formations and medalists in VFS. I certainly wouldn't put it past them, though wearing booties can make knee flying a lot easier Wink


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Feb 24, 2012, 4:09 PM
Post #14 of 43 (5776 views)
Shortcut
Re: HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

It's official, attempts at the first major Sitfly Formation National Record are scheduled for:

August 24-26th
Skydive Crosskeys, NJ.

Contacts:
Stephen Vogdes (sedgov@yahoo.com)
Dan Ortiz (dano@ck1freefly.com)
Myself (Simon Bones) contact info linked below


danielcroft  (D 31103)

Feb 26, 2012, 6:58 PM
Post #15 of 43 (5623 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Glad they've finally done this! Now we see how hard it is to get a big head up record. HD is 108 right? I'd think that upright would take a while to get there.


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Mar 4, 2012, 5:14 PM
Post #16 of 43 (5478 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

The first ever sitfly formation state record has officially been set at Skydive Spaceland in Texas, now recognized as official home of the best sitfliers in the state. Picture is attached below.

We launched a 4 way base and had three stingers to make a 7 way. Record was built after two official attempts. Joe Getty was the photographer and Henry Butler was the certifying judge.

There was absolutely NO head down flying on this jump.

So which state will be the second to set their first state record? I hear Ohio is planning something soon.

I'm stoked that we got this going as a starting point to what I predict will be a lot more head up bigways in the future. This is a first stepping stone for much much more to come. I'd love to see this formation size beaten, and soon, but who will do it? We're formulating plans to break our own record within the next month and set the bar even higher. Maybe Skydive Dallas can do it? I heard none of those flailing monkeys even know how to sitfly Tongue

Skydive Crosskeys is reserving two turbine planes for the first US National Sitfly Formation record in August. I hope everyone starts practicing your head up exits and head up level slot dockings now!


(This post was edited by SimonBones on Mar 4, 2012, 5:14 PM)
Attachments: Sit Record.jpg (196 KB)


stayhigh  (F 111)

Mar 4, 2012, 9:13 PM
Post #17 of 43 (5450 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Headdown approach should be allowed.
Even the big way belly jumps starts out as a head down and they still count.

Approach on head and transition and sting on your feet would result in bigger formation I believe.

still very interesting big way formation.

break off on bigger way sit would bring some head ache tho.
do you front flip into head and than break off??? or do you turn 180 in a sit than front flip to had than break off???

I predict nothing bigger than 60 way for a long long time.


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Mar 4, 2012, 10:13 PM
Post #18 of 43 (5446 views)
Shortcut
Re: [stayhigh] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

For a national attempt head down flying would definitely be allowed. There's nothing in the rule book that says you can't and when it boils down to a record being on the line, your job is to get to your slot as fast as you can however you can. SOME people out there don't need to approach on their heads however. I have definitely seen people on their feet pass up head downers in a dive to a formation and beat others to slots. Vertical is vertical, upright is harder, but some have those skills.

It's just fun to talk shit.

The break off thing has been the hot topic of some debates lately. There are different schools of thought as to what is best, pros and cons to each.

Some are in the camp of front loop to head and perform a normal HD bigway breakoff.
PROS: Properly clears airspace and generally results in most efficient horizontal separation from the formation.
CONS: Requires asking people to do a HD transition right next to the formation while pods are breaking up, dytters are going off, etc and the consequences for mucking up that transition even a little are pretty nasty.

Some are in the turn 180 and flock out on your feet camp.
PROS: Properly clears airspace for initial breakoff, less severe consequences for performing a little sloppy.
CONS: Feet first tracking is pretty blind in terms of what you're tracking into so eventually you'll have to transition to a head first track anyway. Doesn't achieve initial horizontal separation as efficiently.

We've been playing with both all weekend, I don't think there's really a clear winner. Some people are not rock solid with your HD transitions in tight traffic while under pressure. Some people are not very good at flocking feet first. The answer may come down to having people do whichever one they're better at (and they will take some practice on smaller ways). I can't see why both can't be out there on a jump, any configuration I can think of allows for each orientation to have clear visibility of others breaking off with a different method.

It would be really interesting to hear some other opinions, experiences, etc for the best way to break off from a sit bigway. I feel like we've debated all the scenarios and combinations, but it's hard to know what you haven't thought of.


stayhigh  (F 111)

Mar 5, 2012, 5:11 AM
Post #19 of 43 (5424 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Has anyone thought of backsliding to begin with and do front flip into Head and get flatten out???


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Mar 5, 2012, 7:23 AM
Post #20 of 43 (5413 views)
Shortcut
Re: [stayhigh] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

We talked about it, but it doesn't clear the airspace behind you as you start sliding out. Let's say you were a first or second stinger on the base in a 5 way closed pod, there is a bridge connecting pods as well as stingers on your pod. Trying to backslide out here as a standard breakoff procedure would just run you into other people. You'd have a few dozen people around a formation just backsliding out radially without looking where they're going and a collision is going to happen.

Once the collision happens, one or more in that collision cork and the photographer above who is shooting the formation has several bullets coming at him. Don't want to be in those shoes.

At a minimum people would have to clear the airspace both above and behind (radially outward) before going anywhere.

The breakoff logistics for doing bigways head up is going to be a tricky pickle. It will probably be the most determining factor as to who has sufficient skills to participate, since it starts putting lives at risk. We'll be faced with a pretty hairy choice. Do we simply require that anyone doing large head up formations be a bad ass head down flyer so we can ensure safe break offs? Do we mandate that everyone has to be able to flock feet first like a rockstar? Both?


dqpacker  (D 32043)

Mar 5, 2012, 6:01 PM
Post #21 of 43 (5368 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

I for one, will be practicing flocking feet first like a mortherfucking rockstar!


danielcroft  (D 31103)

Mar 6, 2012, 9:06 AM
Post #22 of 43 (5310 views)
Shortcut
Re: [dqpacker] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Feet first break off seems like a really bad idea to me, you're going exactly to the space you can't see. How is that safe? How about a simple and slow 180 in place, clear airspace all around (including looking up) and then belly track away? I've done a couple of front loops to back tracks from (small) formations and, while they're a lot of fun, the control factor is going to be an issue. Clearly I'm not the greatest skydiver in the world so I know that others are better at this stuff than me but that doesn't make anyone immune from mistakes.


78RATS  (D 25449)

Mar 6, 2012, 3:45 PM
Post #23 of 43 (5274 views)
Shortcut
Re: [danielcroft] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

you said belly ahhahahahaha
Cool


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Mar 6, 2012, 4:28 PM
Post #24 of 43 (5270 views)
Shortcut
Re: [danielcroft] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Like I said above, feet first tracking can leave you pretty blind in the direction you're tracking, but as far as initial separation from the formation goes, you can turn 180, clear the air above and radially outward, then flock to achieve that initial separation from the formation. Too many commas I know. For that first initial separation you're moving into an airspace you've cleared. After the initial separation from the formation feet first, call it 30-40 feet or so, then you could continue on in a more visible head first tracking position whether that be on your back or ::gasp:: belly. I've done this on mixed orientation formations as big as mid 30's and it seemed to work just fine. But then again, we haven't really explored having dozens of people all on their feet doing this simultaneously.


stayhigh  (F 111)

Mar 6, 2012, 7:13 PM
Post #25 of 43 (5257 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

1. Sit to Head backflip and flock than track
2. Sit to Head front flip and flock than track.

Those two seems most easiest and logical.

turn 180 feet first than what??? do the twisty thing and go forward on your head?? than sounds way more chaotic, and most will find feet first very ineffective and transition to head while in that awkward forward motion will be difficult.

A lot of people now days are proficient with backflip or front flip to head from sit, thanks to tunnel.


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Mar 6, 2012, 8:53 PM
Post #26 of 43 (1983 views)
Shortcut
Re: [stayhigh] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
1. Sit to Head backflip and flock than track
2. Sit to Head front flip and flock than track.

Those two seems most easiest and logical.

turn 180 feet first than what??? do the twisty thing and go forward on your head?? than sounds way more chaotic, and most will find feet first very ineffective and transition to head while in that awkward forward motion will be difficult.

A lot of people now days are proficient with backflip or front flip to head from sit, thanks to tunnel.

So by your thought, we isolate the availability of head up bigways to only those who are rockstars on their heads because of the assumption that it's simply not possible people out there are that good on their feet. I disagree.

I think those two options are easiest and most logical only if you're great on your head but suck hardcore on your feet. Except not everybody out there sucks on their feet.

So yeah, turn 180 and then either front loop to head first belly down, or cartwheel to head first belly up. I don't think it's more "chaotic" at all, in fact I don't even think it's difficult and do these transitions regularly to break off from sit slots. I challenge you to spend a weekend practicing these things instead of nay saying.

I think the mentality you're presenting is that it is not possible to do anything and everything that anyone can do on their heads while on your feet, I simply reject that idea. I would agree in my experience that it is certainly more difficult to pursue that direction, but I wouldn't dismiss it. It simply requires a higher skill.

There was a time when belly flyers looked at head down flyers and warned about it being unsafe, uncontrollable, and laughed at the idea of conducting safe breakoffs while tracking on your back. The evolution of the sport has obviously laid those concerns to rest. There is a time right here and right now, where folks talk about feet first break offs as too difficult, ineffective, and too "awkward", but I have seen evidence out there in the sky from great skydivers that says otherwise. Apparently doing so is neither awkward nor ineffective for some at all.

The effectiveness and cleanliness of your transitions are not limited by an absolute physical law, but limited on how much you've practiced them. Naturally most bigwat folk have spent more time practicing head down formation break off procedures and so HD flock/track feels more natural amongst the head down bigway crowd.

I agree the development of wind tunnels across the world has allowed more people to become proficient at flip transitions to their heads, but again, if we restrict the new frontier of head up bigways to the idea that only highly experienced head down flyers can participate because *they're the only ones* who can possibly break off safely, we essentially cop out on the idea of pioneering new techniques of flight by falling back on the old school. I reject that.

I think it's awesome that "most will find feet first very ineffective and transition to head while in that awkward forward motion will be difficult", it just means that now we have a standard to separate the kids from the adults.


stayhigh  (F 111)

Mar 6, 2012, 9:27 PM
Post #27 of 43 (1979 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

i'm just throwing out my version of ideas out there, dude.
Not trying to argue anything.

But typically when the person is able to feet flock they tend to do better on their head.

If the skill aren't there, I'd say that the person is not going to be able to participate in a big way.

Just like head down big way requires people to do turn 180, go forward than flat out, big way sit might have to require people to be able to transition into head in place prior to breaking off.

All based off on your statement to turn 180 in sit and than feet flock forward first.

Why not than do 180 in a sit and do cartwheel and go forward??

Remember, we are on Dorkzone.com people say dumbass things and even when not trying to say dumbass things it may come across as a dumbass thing.

Words gets lost in translation. Not to piss you off or diss you anything.

I'm all for the event. 3 plane + sit jump will be sick.


(This post was edited by stayhigh on Mar 6, 2012, 9:29 PM)


SimonBones  (D 28573)

Mar 6, 2012, 10:31 PM
Post #28 of 43 (1970 views)
Shortcut
Re: [stayhigh] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Haha, no one's pissed off mate. Tone is tough to get through in type. I like the discussion.

I don't think it's fair to set a standard on what some people perceive to be "typical". I've met people who have struggled with head down flying for years but were ninja on their feet for thousands of jumps. In that case, should we turn them away form a head up bigway because they're not comfortable with a pressured head down transition in tight proximity to the formation? Even if we know full well that they could perform the break off just as clean if not even cleaner on their feet?

It sounds like you're of the opinion that in order to be very skilled on your feet, that you must also be already even more talented on your head. While I agree that for most bigway folks I've met that does seem to be the case, I don't think it can be made as a blanket statement. Some people just have a natural knack for doing shit on their feet and some sort of mental block with the upside down-ness.

And by all means I wouldn't tell anyone they can't head down it out if that's what they're better at doing when a record is on the line. I'm sure at that moment plenty of people nowadays would prefer it.

But I'm just not sure I agree that someone necessarily has to be great on their head in order to perform that well on their feet.

In the mean time while an official record is not on the line, I think it's a great opportunity for people out there to push themselves to plan more feet first flocking dives instead of the traditional sunset track. Spend a summer doing that and see how the feet first flocking skills develop out there. Spend a summer doing transitions from feet first flocks to head first tracks of different orientations, it will get a whole lot easier and less awkward.

I think in time with a training mentality like this, more people will let go of the security blanket of head down flying when it comes to head up bigways.

Honestly, in my personal opinion from experience, I think a lot of folks are scared of feet first flying. I think a lot of people feel they've proven themselves in the bigway community with their head down flying and are insecure about having to perform up to those standards on their feet. On your next bigway event try and get some folks to take sit slots, be last divers with you, and dive to the formation on your feet, see how many people step up to the plate.

As you can see from some events past:
http://vimeo.com/21361181
Most people would rather dive on their head and flip to feet anyway even when it's not a record, why?


piisfish

Mar 7, 2012, 3:52 AM
Post #29 of 43 (1965 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

If you guys need info on how to backlside, just look at me trying to stay vertical UnsureUnsureUnsure Laugh


hparrish  (D 25090)

Apr 12, 2012, 11:47 AM
Post #30 of 43 (1867 views)
Shortcut
Re: [stayhigh] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

2. Sit to Head front flip and flock than track.

I think this is the cleanest and best option for most people, and prevents the most movement either backwards into the base or forward toward the stingers / camera flyers.

So is Cross Keys at the end of August to Official Place / Time?


hparrish  (D 25090)

Apr 12, 2012, 11:55 AM
Post #31 of 43 (1867 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

I think feet first flocking after a 180 rotation, isnt going to get us the separation we need for Big Ways, because a lot of people are going to suck at it.


Squeak  (E 1313)

Apr 12, 2012, 7:56 PM
Post #32 of 43 (1834 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hparrish] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
2. Sit to Head front flip and flock than track.

I think this is the cleanest and best option for most people, and prevents the most movement either backwards into the base or forward toward the stingers / camera flyers.

So is Cross Keys at the end of August to Official Place / Time?

Im obviously missing something here.

What's wrong with staged break off, and everyone just going from a sit rolling back and back tracking away??


hparrish  (D 25090)

Apr 13, 2012, 11:03 PM
Post #33 of 43 (1755 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Squeak] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

You've gotta visually clear your airspace behind you, flock away first, then track. Transition to visually check for clear airspace behind you. Flock to maintiain verticle head level while simultaneously creating horizontal separation. Then when clear from other groups start the track for maximum horizontal separation.

All three steps are critical with big ways.


SimonBones  (D 28573)

May 8, 2012, 1:37 PM
Post #34 of 43 (1613 views)
Shortcut
Re: HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Sorry been behind. School finals been keeping me down. More news on the National Sitfly record in August at Crosskeys:

Brian Buckland and Leland Bendel are confirmed for shooting the historic event.

The first ever two plane shot all sitfly formation in the history of the world, and first ever official US National Sitfly formation record.

Fuck yeah.


dqpacker  (D 32043)

May 21, 2012, 10:09 AM
Post #35 of 43 (1424 views)
Shortcut
HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

https://www.facebook.com/...p;type=1&theater

Nice job everyone.


danielcroft  (D 31103)

May 21, 2012, 6:53 PM
Post #36 of 43 (1387 views)
Shortcut
Re: [dqpacker] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Nice job that I'm not allowed to see that content on facebook? Tongue

I was told that the final decision for the head up breakoff was a front flip to out facing HD and then standard HD track off? I don't get that (if it's true) why do we want to speed up the skydive on breakoff? Why did we dismiss a 360 in place to a standard sitfly breakoff? As you can see from my profile, I'm not the most experienced skydiver in the world these questions aren't meant to be rhetorical. Seems like we'd be limiting who could be on these jumps to those who can fly HD as well? I did one of these on the weekend in a group of 6 or 7 IIRC. Seems like a lot of movement when what you really want is a simple, stable and controlled exit.


dqpacker  (D 32043)

May 21, 2012, 7:40 PM
Post #37 of 43 (1383 views)
Shortcut
Re: [danielcroft] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

13way HeadUp Feet First Texas State Record. 5way sit round base launched from an Otter. At Skydive Spaceland this past Saturday. Photo by Joseph Mire.

FEET FIRST REVOLUTION


(This post was edited by dqpacker on May 21, 2012, 7:44 PM)
Attachments: 556877_10100713855524897_29605190_51044330_867698598_n.jpg (42.6 KB)


danielcroft  (D 31103)

May 21, 2012, 8:19 PM
Post #38 of 43 (1374 views)
Shortcut
Re: [dqpacker] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Nice. I heard they launched a 6 way base and had ninjas?


loudtom  (D 23115)

May 23, 2012, 3:07 PM
Post #39 of 43 (1287 views)
Shortcut
Re: [kallend] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

 



"So it could include "knee flying"? I've seen video of Airspeed doing a 10-way sequential while knee flying.'

Me tooo...it was cool and would be considerably different than sit flying..imho.


SimonBones  (D 28573)

May 23, 2012, 5:05 PM
Post #40 of 43 (1274 views)
Shortcut
Re: [danielcroft] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

During the warm ups we did some 6 way base launches, results were pretty inconsistent out of the side of an otter, so when it came time for record crunch time, we opted to stick with the 5 way sit base.

There is no final decision on break off, not sure where you heard this. On these record jumps there were maybe only two people who were front flipping to HD for break off. Roughly 4-5 people were turning 180 and tracking off feet first. The rest were just turning 180 in their sit, moving forward a little bit while clearing airspace above and forward, and bellying out to a track.

I'm not a big fan of the latter, but it hasn't really caused any problems yet. The video guy belly's out as soon as the first wave of folks turn their 180 to stay out of danger's way.

All in all things went pretty awesome. With practice camps and warm ups, people are getting pretty damn good at launching sit formations, diving/floating on their feet through the hill, and absorbing waves in the formation.

There's going to be some pretty cool sit stuff going on at Carolinafest and I'll be sure to get some more going at some of the other events I'm doing this year. Skydive Dallas is also starting to hold some camps of their own in the feet first arts. Glad to hear it, I always heard they suck on their feet up there. But I'm glad Texas is leading the feet first revolution. There are plans for a 20 way at Skydive Dallas later this year.

I attached a pic of one of our 5 way base launches. Enjoy Smile
Attachments: 462211_10100715000031297_29605190_51053620_1304538934_o.jpg (266 KB)


danielcroft  (D 31103)

May 23, 2012, 9:47 PM
Post #41 of 43 (1256 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Thanks Simon.

I was chatting with Rob from 'Crow and he mentioned that idea, not sure who exactly said that to him. What's your feeling on a 360 HU and then regular HU break off (back track away)? We've been working on 4 and 5 way HU exits, man they're hard to do!

Great work on the record guys, didn't mean to sound like I was down on it at all, just trying to get my head around some of the safety aspects.


likearock  (D 24640)

Jul 19, 2012, 4:11 AM
Post #42 of 43 (1026 views)
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

In reply to:
The breakoff logistics for doing bigways head up is going to be a tricky pickle. It will probably be the most determining factor as to who has sufficient skills to participate, since it starts putting lives at risk. We'll be faced with a pretty hairy choice. Do we simply require that anyone doing large head up formations be a bad ass head down flyer so we can ensure safe break offs? Do we mandate that everyone has to be able to flock feet first like a rockstar? Both?

In situations like this, I've always been in favor of the simplest solution that meets all the critical requirements. Here's my take on what those requirements are (and Simon, let me know if I've missed any):

- clear your airspace above, below, and around you.
- initiate forward movement away from the center of the formation in a way that does not result in changing the fall rate (so that everyone's relative levels can be maintained).
- gradually transform that forward motion into a flat track and create adequate distance between yourself and the others before deploying your canopy.

The current alternatives (front-flip to head down vs. feet first flock away) seem overly complicated and challenging enough to be prone to error - in a bigway, all it takes is for one person to screw it up and you can have a serious problem.

So why not consider the following simpler procedure which seems, on the face of it, to meet all the requirements above?

- Breakoff begins: Turn 180 degrees in the sit and while doing so, clear your airspace.
- Transition to the delta tracking position (belly down, head positioned lower than feet). The delta position, when angled correctly, will maintain the prevailing (freefly) fall rate and will also provide the initial forward motion away from the formation.
- Gradually decrease the delta angle till it becomes a flat track while adding periodic barrel rolls for extra safety.
- Having tracked away the agreed upon amount and cleared the airspace above and near you, wave off and deploy.

A number of my friends will be on the Crosskeys record attempts. It would be great if there could be agreement on a single breakoff strategy by then.

Thoughts?


likearock  (D 24640)

Aug 13, 2012, 4:44 AM
Post #43 of 43 (735 views)
Shortcut
Re: [likearock] HUGE Freefly news [In reply to] Can't Post

Quote:
So why not consider the following simpler procedure which seems, on the face of it, to meet all the requirements above?

- Breakoff begins: Turn 180 degrees in the sit and while doing so, clear your airspace.
- Transition to the delta tracking position (belly down, head positioned lower than feet). The delta position, when angled correctly, will maintain the prevailing (freefly) fall rate and will also provide the initial forward motion away from the formation.
- Gradually decrease the delta angle till it becomes a flat track while adding periodic barrel rolls for extra safety.
- Having tracked away the agreed upon amount and cleared the airspace above and near you, wave off and deploy.

A number of my friends will be on the Crosskeys record attempts. It would be great if there could be agreement on a single breakoff strategy by then.

Thoughts?

Here's something I realized during one of Francesco's angle flying camps at the Ranch: The difference between a delta tracking position and head down backwards motion is really just a few degrees of angle - they're basically the same body orientation. Once you understand that, you can see just how similar this "delta" breakoff strategy for head-up is to the widely accepted breakoff for head-down. Take a look:

Beginning
Head-down: Turn 180 degrees while clearing your airspace.
Head-up: Turn 180 degrees while clearing your airspace.

Middle
Head-down: Initiate movement away from the center of the formation by means of HD forward motion.
Head-up: Initiate movement away from the center of the formation by means of HD backwards motion.

End
Head-down: Gradually transform the HD orientation to a flat track to distance yourself from the formation.
Head-up: Gradually transform the HD orientation to a flat track to distance yourself from the formation.

BTW, congratulations to all on the new HD record!



Forums : Skydiving Disciplines : Freeflying

 


Search for (options)