'So now you are saying you statement below was wrong? Kenny never actually said (your words): "But he was WITH Kenny at the time of the hijacking. Why did he say that?"
Quote: "I always point to the only important thing that came out of his appearance: He says Kenny could be the hijacker. But he was WITH Kenny at the time of the hijacking. Why did he say that?"
What in the name of Johnny Appleseed are you talking about? 'Kenny never actually said...' I never quoted Kenny Christiansen there.Geestman stated on Decoded he thought Kenny could be the hijacker.
Since there are witnesses who place Geestman with Kenny over the week of the crime, I asked why Geestman would volunteer that. Everything else about it you can read in my previous post.
"If I'd observed all the rules, I'd never have got anywhere..."
Marilyn Monroe
I can read.
Your previous post literally says:
"He says Kenny could be the hijacker. But he was WITH Kenny at the time of the hijacking. Why did he say that? "
You are saying Geestman SAID it.
Dont jump down my throat. They are your words.
I guess you didnt say what you meant! Or you miss spoke ...
Or this is all Blevins-speak ?
I can only go by what you say and do not say. Its not splitting hairs. Its reading the English language.
If you dont say what you mean ... whose fault is that?
Never mind.
I understand you are now saying Geestmanw as not aware that others had placed him with Kenny. But you said in your post quote: Why did he say that? After you had just said: He says Kenny could be the hijacker.
Bottom line is, you need to say things more clearly to eliminate any possible confusion. You probably thought you did. You probably think we are all mind readers too.
I think I now understand what you tried to say but didnt say clearly.
Maybe you should forget about Marilyn Monroe and concentrate on writing?
(This post was edited by georger on Oct 11, 2012, 2:34 AM)
Edit Log:
Post edited by georger
() on Oct 11, 2012, 2:32 AM
Post edited by georger
() on Oct 11, 2012, 2:34 AM
