Sony digital. DSC- V-1. 5.1 megapixel. An oldie but a goodie. Look...there isn't any real mystery here. Kenny's license and Army records say the same thing. He was five eight. I am five ten and a half. I only did the comparison for something to do while I was at the apartments waiting for the manager to get Kenny's original rental app from the main office. I appreciate your effort, though.
Well that is a nice lens as are all of these Carl Zeiss branded designs. Your lens is f2.8-4/7-28 (4x zoom). Olympus etc followed the same lens design paying nice royalties to Zeiss. So your camera is f2.8 focused at infinity, with zoom clicks (3) to bring it to f/4, f/7, and f/28. Each successive zoom click crops the image accordingly, to a smaller frame with the smallest frame at maximum magnification at f/28.
Now, looking at Far's double photo the scale of the two photos begins to make sense in terms of the different cameras used. Im betting whoever took your photo zommed in to frame you in the door something like what Kenny's photo portrays, ie same relative scale. And in order to do that with your camera the operator hit the second zoom click and thought 'that looks right, same scale", and took your photo. So your photo is at around f/7.
Kenny's photo was probably f/8 being an old Brownie 620 fixed lens f/5.6-f/8 or Kodak 35mm shot at f/8.
That would explain why the scales in these photos is roughly the same, except for the differences Farflung noted.
Comments?
(This post was edited by georger on Sep 30, 2012, 12:13 AM)
Edit Log:
Post edited by georger
() on Sep 29, 2012, 11:58 PM
Post edited by georger
() on Sep 30, 2012, 12:00 AM
Post edited by georger
() on Sep 30, 2012, 12:13 AM
