I'd like to be sure I understand this; You don't feel BOD members should have opinions on one side of an issue/discussion/argument/debate? Because if that is the case, what is the point of having elections? People vote for those that they feel will present and protect their best interests. Therefore...if you feel Jan or anyone else has done something that isn't in your best interest, then don't vote for them.
I feel someone running for BOD should not take sides on a legal action between two USPA drops zones and definitely should not give legal advice at the least. Still waiting for Jans reply on this matter!
(This post was edited by NYKid on Dec 16, 2010, 8:03 PM)