Re: [sundevil777] Javelin RSL.. unairworthy or not?
If the "approved configuration" part of their statement was important to this discussion, then they should not have left it open with "highly discouraged" and "not recommended". Those words do not mean "not allowed".
I understand what your saying. I'm just trying to offer the other side of the story. If somebody bounced and the FAA started to really dig deep on the issue and found out that a component that was there during the TSO approval was no longer present....I wouldn't want my name on that card.
(This post was edited by divnswoop on Feb 20, 2007, 1:43 PM)
Post edited by divnswoop
() on Feb 20, 2007, 1:43 PM