Forums: Skydiving: Safety and Training: Re: [winsor] Cypress Fires New Rule- Perris: Edit Log

Dagny  (B 28462)

Oct 15, 2004, 9:01 AM

Views: 6229
Re: [winsor] Cypress Fires New Rule- Perris

Everyone is not cut out for this sport.

I don't think it's fair to make this statement. In the short time that I have been a skydiver, the only people I've talked to that have lost altitude awareness are AFF students and advanced jumpers who were too intense with their someone I know who was doing an intense carving dive head down and both people lost alti awareness. I don't think there is an excuse good enough for losing your life due to losing altitude awareness, but losing awareness happens. It's a mistake, but mistakes happen. Of course, I understand the possible consequences of these mistakes and I recognize the gravity of these situations, but it seems like a harsh rule. Grounded for a day, for a week, and requiring a refresher in altitude awareness and sky safety, and/or requiring a jump with an instructor before allowing the offender to return to jumping make more sense to me than a 30 day layoff in which the person will simply jump at the next closest dropzone.

If someone did a purposeful action that resulted in cypres fire, I could understand a 30 day suspension to admonish them for their reckless behavior. But, an accidental occurrence doesn't necessarily warrant the same punishment, does it?

Why aren't there mandatory suspensions for other accidents which can result in death? i.e. making a low turn..?

(This post was edited by Dagny on Oct 15, 2004, 9:04 AM)

Edit Log:
Post edited by Dagny () on Oct 15, 2004, 9:04 AM

Search for (options)